Vidu Q2 | Text to Image

each::sense is in private beta.
Eachlabs | AI Workflows for app builders
vidu-q2-text-to-image

VIDU-Q2

Vidu Text-to-Image transforms your prompts into high-quality, visually rich images with accurate detail, style control, and creative flexibility.

Avg Run Time: 0.000s

Model Slug: vidu-q2-text-to-image

Release Date: December 3, 2025

Playground

Input

Output

Example Result

Preview and download your result.

Preview
Each execution costs $0.1000. With $1 you can run this model about 10 times.

API & SDK

Create a Prediction

Send a POST request to create a new prediction. This will return a prediction ID that you'll use to check the result. The request should include your model inputs and API key.

Get Prediction Result

Poll the prediction endpoint with the prediction ID until the result is ready. The API uses long-polling, so you'll need to repeatedly check until you receive a success status.

Readme

Table of Contents
Overview
Technical Specifications
Key Considerations
Tips & Tricks
Capabilities
What Can I Use It For?
Things to Be Aware Of
Limitations

Overview

Vidu Q2 Text-to-Image (often referred to simply as Vidu Q2 image generation) is a high-end image generation model developed by ShengShu Technology, a multimodal AI company known for its Vidu video generation system. The Q2 release extends the original video-focused Vidu model into a unified engine for both still images and video, adding a full text-to-image stack, enhanced reference-to-image, and image editing capabilities. The “vidu-q2-text-to-image” model description you provided aligns with this Q2 image stack, which is positioned as a production-grade solution for creative, commercial, and design workflows.

The model is designed to generate high-quality, visually rich images from natural language prompts with strong style control and high consistency across multiple assets. It emphasizes accurate detail, robust character and layout preservation when using reference images, and native support for high resolutions up to 4K. A key differentiator is that the same core model powers both images and video, so still images can be used as references for motion, enabling coherent pipelines from concept art and storyboards to final video sequences. Compared with other flagship image models, ShengShu highlights advantages in consistency, speed (often around 5 seconds per image), and cost efficiency for large-scale production work.

Technically, Vidu Q2’s image capabilities are built as a “full image stack” on top of its multimodal visual engine, which handles text prompts, reference images, and editing instructions within a single system. The model is tuned to handle diverse visual styles (including realistic, anime, comics, and traditional ink/Chinese aesthetics) while preserving spatial layout and identity even with multiple references. This makes it particularly suitable for professional creative teams who need repeatable characters, logos, or scenes across campaigns and media formats.

Technical Specifications

  • Architecture: Multimodal visual generation stack built on the Vidu Q2 engine (unified image and video model with text-to-image, reference-to-image, and image editing capabilities)
  • Parameters: Not publicly disclosed as of the latest announcements (no official parameter count found in public sources)
  • Resolution: Native support for 1080p, 2K, and 4K image outputs for production use cases such as key visuals, posters, and digital out-of-home assets
  • Input/Output formats:
  • Input: Text prompts; single or multiple reference images (for identity/layout preservation); editing instructions (e.g., modifications of existing images)
  • Output: High-resolution still images (up to 4K), suitable for downstream use in video pipelines via the same model
  • Performance metrics:
  • Generation speed: As fast as about 5 seconds per image, depending on complexity and reference usage
  • Consistency: Ranks ahead of some competing models on the Artificial Analysis Image Editing Leaderboard for image editing and consistency tasks, according to ShengShu’s announcement
  • Quality: Benchmarked by the vendor as competitive with the latest flagship image models, with specific strength in reference-based consistency and style stability across sequences

Key Considerations

  • When using multi-reference workflows (e.g., multiple character or product images), the model is optimized to preserve identity and spatial layout, so invest time in curating clean, representative reference images.
  • High resolutions (2K–4K) and complex multi-reference prompts can increase generation time and computational load; plan batch jobs or pipelines accordingly for large campaigns.
  • For best results, provide detailed, unambiguous prompts that specify style, composition, lighting, and mood; vague prompts may underutilize the model’s control capabilities.
  • Reference-to-image is particularly powerful; use it to lock character faces, logos, or layout before iterating on styling and background variations.
  • Quality vs speed trade-off: more complex prompts with multiple references and intricate layouts will typically move generation times closer to the upper end (around or above 5 seconds) compared with simple single-prompt generations.
  • For consistent series (comics, campaigns, storyboards), keep a stable reference set and re-use the same prompts and seeds (if exposed) to maximize cross-image coherence.
  • The model appears especially strong with anime-style four-panel comics and Chinese/ink-painting aesthetics; leverage explicit style descriptors for these domains.
  • Avoid overloading prompts with conflicting style instructions (e.g., mixing too many art movements or camera directives), which can reduce coherence and stylistic clarity.
  • When editing images, keep edit instructions localized and explicit (e.g., “change background to…” rather than broad re-descriptions of the entire scene) to preserve core identity and layout.
  • For production workflows, design a prompt library and reference library early, then standardize naming and reuse to streamline collaboration between designers, marketers, and engineers.

Tips & Tricks

  • Use multi-stage prompting:
  • First, generate base characters or key objects with text-to-image.
  • Then, save selected images as references and use reference-to-image to produce variations, new poses, or different environments while keeping identity stable.
  • For strong character consistency:
  • Provide 2–4 clean reference images showing the character from different angles.
  • Keep clothing, hairstyle, and key features consistent across references.
  • Add explicit identity constraints in the prompt (e.g., “same woman as reference, same hairstyle and outfit, different background”).
  • To achieve high-quality 4K outputs:
  • Start with prompts that clearly specify desired resolution and detail level (e.g., “cinematic 4K key visual, ultra-detailed lighting and textures”).
  • For complex scenes, consider first generating at 1080p or 2K for composition approval, then re-running at 4K using the same prompt and references.
  • Style control tips:
  • Explicitly name styles (e.g., “anime, four-panel comic layout,” “Chinese ink painting,” “photorealistic studio product shot”) to leverage model priors.
  • For comics or sequential art, specify panel structure and reading order in the prompt (e.g., “four-panel comic, horizontal layout, consistent characters across all panels”).
  • Layout and logo preservation:
  • For campaigns or UI/UX mockups, provide a reference layout image and prompt with “preserve layout and logo placement, change theme to…” to keep structure while changing style.
  • Iterative refinement strategy:
  • Start with broader prompts to explore style and composition.
  • Shortlist 2–3 promising outputs as new references.
  • Refine prompts with more detailed constraints (lighting, camera angle, color palette) while reusing references to lock identity and layout.
  • Advanced workflows:
  • Use generated stills as visual canon for subsequent video generation within the same model family, ensuring that characters and environments in the video match the approved image assets.
  • Build storyboards by generating sequences of stills with consistent references, then convert selected frames into video segments via the shared Vidu Q2 engine.
  • For advertising and A/B testing:
  • Keep core subject and layout fixed via references.
  • Iterate prompts on background, color grading, and copy placement to quickly generate multiple variants for testing without re-designing assets from scratch.

Capabilities

  • High-quality text-to-image generation with detailed, production-ready outputs suitable for marketing, entertainment, and design use cases.
  • Robust reference-to-image capabilities that preserve character identity, logos, and spatial layout, even with multiple reference images.
  • Support for full image editing workflows, enabling targeted changes to existing images while keeping core elements stable.
  • Native generation at 1080p, 2K, and 4K resolutions, enabling direct use in key visuals, posters, digital signage, and other high-impact assets without external upscaling.
  • Strong performance on image editing and consistency benchmarks, including ranking ahead of some leading proprietary models on the Artificial Analysis Image Editing Leaderboard.
  • Particular strength in anime-style four-panel comic layouts and traditional Chinese/ink-painting aesthetics, with rich textures and atmospheric rendering.
  • Unified engine for both still images and video, allowing seamless reuse of generated images as references in video workflows and vice versa.
  • Fast generation times (around 5 seconds for many images) that support real-time iteration and high-throughput creative pipelines.
  • Versatility across use cases: character design, storyboarding, product visualization, advertising key visuals, social content, and concept art.
  • High consistency across sequences of images, making it well-suited for campaigns, series, and narrative content where recurring characters or motifs are required.

What Can I Use It For?

  • Professional advertising and marketing:
  • Generating 4K key visuals, posters, and digital out-of-home assets with fast turnaround for campaigns, as highlighted in vendor materials targeting commercial production workflows.
  • Creating multiple consistent variants of product shots and hero images for A/B testing and performance marketing.
  • Entertainment and media production:
  • Designing characters, environments, and storyboards for short-form video, animation, and early-stage film pre-visualization, leveraging strong consistency between stills and video.
  • Producing anime-style four-panel comics or webtoon-like sequences with consistent characters and styles across panels.
  • Branding and identity:
  • Generating brand-consistent imagery where logos, mascots, or brand characters must remain stable across many assets (social posts, banners, thumbnails).
  • Game and interactive content development:
  • Rapid prototyping of characters, environments, and UI mockups, with reference-to-image used to refine concepts while preserving key gameplay silhouettes and layouts.
  • E-commerce and product visualization:
  • Creating lifestyle and studio shots of products in varied settings while preserving the exact product appearance using reference images.
  • Design and creative agencies:
  • Building mood boards, visual directions, and iterative concepts that can be quickly translated into video storyboards using the same engine.
  • Personal and hobbyist projects (based on community-style discussions and typical usage patterns for similar models):
  • Generating fan art, stylized portraits, and narrative illustrations with consistent characters across multiple scenes.
  • Creating custom comics or visual stories with recurring characters and themes using text-to-image plus reference-to-image workflows.
  • Industry-specific applications mentioned in analyses:
  • Short-form video and social content for platforms where fast, high-quality visual iteration is critical, with a strong emphasis on consistency for recurring series or branded segments.
  • Early-stage film and advertising production where storyboard fidelity and character continuity across stills and motion are important for client approvals and pre-vis.

Things to Be Aware Of

  • The model’s image stack is relatively new (Q2 release), so documentation, third-party tooling, and open benchmarks are still evolving compared with longer-established image models.
  • Many reported performance claims (speed, benchmark ranking) come from vendor or partner announcements; independent, large-scale benchmarks are still limited in public sources.
  • Generation time (around 5 seconds) is generally fast, but users note that complex multi-reference setups and high-resolution outputs can increase latency; planning for batch or asynchronous workflows is advisable in production settings.
  • Strong consistency is a major advantage, but it depends heavily on the quality and relevance of reference images; noisy or inconsistent references can degrade identity preservation and layout stability.
  • The unified image–video engine is powerful but also means that model updates targeting video may change some image behavior (styles, defaults, or sampling strategies) over time; versioning and reproducibility practices are important for long-running projects.
  • Users and analysts emphasize that the model excels when prompts are explicit about style and structure (e.g., “four-panel comic,” “Chinese ink painting,” “product hero shot”), suggesting that under-specified prompts may not fully leverage its style priors.
  • Resource requirements for the backend are not publicly detailed, but high-resolution 4K generation and multi-reference workflows imply significant GPU memory and compute; organizations should expect infrastructure similar to other flagship image models for peak throughput.
  • Positive feedback themes:
  • High consistency across images and between images and video.
  • Fast rendering suitable for real-world production.
  • Strong performance in stylized domains like anime and ink painting, and in professional key visual scenarios.
  • Common concerns or open questions in community-style discussions:
  • Limited transparency about architecture details and parameter counts compared with some open-source models.
  • Desire for more public benchmarks, side-by-side comparisons, and user-driven evaluations across diverse datasets.
  • Curiosity about how well it handles niche or highly specific artistic styles beyond those highlighted (anime, Chinese painting, realistic advertising).

Limitations

  • Architectural and parameter details are not fully disclosed, and independent benchmarks are still relatively sparse, making it harder for researchers to rigorously compare against open-source baselines.
  • While consistency and speed are strong, extremely niche artistic styles, unusual compositions, or highly technical diagrams may not match specialized or fine-tuned domain-specific models.
  • High-resolution, multi-reference, and heavy batch generation likely require substantial GPU resources; for extremely resource-constrained environments, lighter-weight or locally quantized models may be more practical.

Pricing

Pricing Detail

This model runs at a cost of $0.10 per execution.

Pricing Type: Fixed

The cost remains the same regardless of which model you use or how long it runs. There are no variables affecting the price. It is a set, fixed amount per run, as the name suggests. This makes budgeting simple and predictable because you pay the same fee every time you execute the model.