Eachlabs | AI Workflows for app builders
flux-krea-image-to-image

Flux Krea | Image to Image

FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is a 12B flow transformer that generates high-quality, aesthetic images from text for personal or commercial use.

Avg Run Time: 12.000s

Model Slug: flux-krea-image-to-image

Input

Enter an URL or choose a file from your computer.

Advanced Controls

Output

Example Result

Preview and download your result.

Preview
Unsupported conditions - pricing not available for this input format

Create a Prediction

Send a POST request to create a new prediction. This will return a prediction ID that you'll use to check the result. The request should include your model inputs and API key.

Get Prediction Result

Poll the prediction endpoint with the prediction ID until the result is ready. The API uses long-polling, so you'll need to repeatedly check until you receive a success status.

Table of Contents
Overview
Technical Specifications
Key Considerations
Tips & Tricks
Capabilities
What Can I Use It For?
Things to Be Aware Of
Limitations

Overview

FLUX.1 Krea [dev] is a large-scale, open-source image generation model developed to advance the capabilities of text-to-image (T2I) systems, particularly in complex reasoning and aesthetic quality. Built as a 12-billion parameter flow transformer, FLUX.1 Krea is designed to generate high-quality, visually compelling images from detailed textual prompts. The model is the result of significant research and engineering efforts, including the creation of the FLUX-Reason-6M dataset and the PRISM-Bench benchmark, both of which aim to address gaps in reasoning and evaluation present in previous T2I models.

Key features of FLUX.1 Krea include its ability to handle prompts requiring imagination, entity recognition, text rendering, diverse artistic styles, emotional expression, and precise composition. The model leverages a Generation Chain-of-Thought (GCoT) approach, breaking down image generation into explicit reasoning steps. This makes FLUX.1 Krea especially suited for tasks demanding nuanced prompt-image alignment and advanced visual reasoning. Its open-source nature and bilingual training data (English and Chinese) further distinguish it from many closed-source competitors, supporting both research and commercial applications at scale.

Technical Specifications

  • Architecture: Flow Transformer (12B parameters)
  • Parameters: 12 billion
  • Resolution: High-resolution image generation; specific maximum resolution not explicitly stated in public sources, but designed for high-quality outputs
  • Input/Output formats: Text input (prompts); image output (standard image formats such as PNG, JPEG)
  • Performance metrics: Evaluated on PRISM-Bench using alignment score and aesthetic score (0-100 scale); composite performance measured across seven tracks including imagination, entity, text rendering, style, affection, composition, and long text

Key Considerations

  • The model excels with prompts that are explicit, detailed, and leverage the six key characteristics (imagination, entity, text rendering, style, affection, composition)
  • Best results are achieved when prompts specify not just content, but also style, emotion, and compositional details
  • Text rendering and long text remain challenging for all T2I models, including FLUX.1 Krea; short, clear text instructions yield better results
  • There is a trade-off between prompt complexity and image fidelity; overly complex or ambiguous prompts may reduce output quality
  • Iterative prompt refinement is often necessary for optimal results, especially for nuanced or abstract concepts
  • Prompt engineering that uses explicit compositional language (e.g., "under," "behind," "in the style of") improves alignment and output quality

Tips & Tricks

  • Use clear, descriptive prompts that include both subject and desired style (e.g., "a city made of glass, rivers of light flow, in cubist style")
  • For text rendering, keep the requested text short and specify placement and style (e.g., "a neon sign that reads ‘FLUX’ in glowing letters")
  • To evoke emotion, include affective language (e.g., "a sense of peaceful solitude, soft lighting")
  • For complex scenes, break down the prompt into compositional elements (e.g., "a lion under a tree, with mountains behind, in watercolor style")
  • Iteratively adjust prompts based on output, refining details or simplifying instructions to improve alignment
  • Experiment with different artistic styles and explicit instructions to explore the model’s versatility
  • For best results with bilingual prompts, ensure clarity and avoid mixing languages within a single prompt

Capabilities

  • Generates high-quality, aesthetic images from detailed text prompts
  • Supports complex reasoning, including imaginative and abstract concepts
  • Handles a wide range of artistic and photographic styles
  • Capable of rendering specific entities and objects with accuracy
  • Can incorporate emotional and compositional elements into images
  • Bilingual support (English and Chinese) for both prompts and output alignment
  • Open-source, enabling research, customization, and commercial use

What Can I Use It For?

  • Professional illustration and concept art for creative industries
  • Automated generation of marketing visuals and advertising assets
  • Educational content creation, including visualizations for textbooks and e-learning
  • Prototyping and ideation for product design and architecture
  • Personal creative projects, such as digital art and storytelling
  • Research in vision-language alignment, reasoning, and multimodal AI
  • Industry-specific applications such as fashion design, game development, and media production

Things to Be Aware Of

  • Some experimental features, such as advanced text rendering and long text handling, are still under active development and may yield inconsistent results
  • Users report that prompt specificity greatly affects output quality; vague prompts often result in generic or misaligned images
  • Performance benchmarks indicate that while FLUX.1 Krea is competitive among open-source models, there remains a gap compared to the latest closed-source systems, especially in text rendering and complex reasoning tasks
  • High-quality image generation may require significant computational resources, especially for batch processing or high-resolution outputs
  • Consistency across multiple generations of the same prompt can vary, particularly for highly abstract or imaginative requests
  • Positive user feedback highlights the model’s versatility, aesthetic quality, and open-source accessibility
  • Common concerns include occasional artifacts in text rendering, difficulty with very long or complex prompts, and the need for iterative prompt tuning

Limitations

  • Text rendering and long text generation remain challenging and may not meet professional standards for all use cases
  • There is a performance gap compared to top closed-source models in certain reasoning and alignment tasks
  • Resource-intensive for large-scale or high-resolution image generation, requiring substantial GPU capacity for optimal performance