KLING-O1
Edits existing videos using natural-language instructions, transforming subjects, environments, and visual style while preserving the original motion structure and timing.
Avg Run Time: 280.000s
Model Slug: kling-o1-video-to-video-edit
Release Date: December 2, 2025
Playground
Input
Enter a URL or choose a file from your computer.
Invalid URL.
(Max 50MB)
Output
Example Result
Preview and download your result.
API & SDK
Create a Prediction
Send a POST request to create a new prediction. This will return a prediction ID that you'll use to check the result. The request should include your model inputs and API key.
Get Prediction Result
Poll the prediction endpoint with the prediction ID until the result is ready. The API uses long-polling, so you'll need to repeatedly check until you receive a success status.
Readme
Overview
kling-o1-video-to-video-edit — Video-to-Video AI Model
Developed by Kling as part of the kling-o1 family, kling-o1-video-to-video-edit empowers creators to transform existing videos using natural-language instructions, preserving original motion, timing, and structure while altering subjects, environments, or styles. This video-to-video AI model solves the challenge of costly reshoots by enabling precise edits like "video restyling" in a unified multimodal system, supporting 6-20 second clips up to 1080p resolution. Ideal for developers seeking a Kling video-to-video API, it handles inputs like text prompts, single videos, and up to 4 reference images for style guidance, making it a go-to for efficient video-to-video editing API workflows.
Technical Specifications
What Sets kling-o1-video-to-video-edit Apart
kling-o1-video-to-video-edit stands out in the video-to-video AI model landscape through its unified multimodal engine, which seamlessly combines text, video, image, and subject inputs for editing in one system—unlike models requiring separate generation and edit pipelines. This enables developers to build streamlined Kling video-to-video applications where a single API call restyles footage with natural language, such as applying cinematic grading while retaining motion.
It supports input videos of 6-20 seconds (truncated if longer), max 100MB in MP4, MOV, WebM, or AVI formats, with optional up to 4 reference images (JPG, PNG, up to 10MB each) for precise style control, outputting in 16:9, 9:16, or 1:1 aspect ratios at up to 1080p. The option to keep original sound ensures audio-visual consistency, allowing quick iterations without regenerating audio.
- Video restyling with motion preservation: Transforms aesthetics like weather or time of day while keeping exact composition and movement, enabling post-production-level changes without reshooting.
- Multi-reference image guidance: Uses up to 4 images to direct styles, ensuring outputs match specific visual references for brand-consistent edits.
- Unified editing in one pass: Natural language prompts modify objects, backgrounds, or lighting directly on input video, outperforming generation-focused competitors in targeted refinements.
Key Considerations
- The model is designed to preserve original motion and timing, so prompts should focus on appearance, style, subjects, and environment, not on changing the temporal structure (e.g., no expectation of re-timing, slow-motion, or reordering shots).
- Strong, specific, and unambiguous textual instructions generally yield better edits than vague prompts; include target subject attributes, style, lighting, and environment in a single, coherent description.
- Input video quality (resolution, compression artifacts, motion blur) strongly affects the quality of the edited output; clean, well-lit, relatively stable footage tends to produce better results.
- Large frame counts and high resolutions significantly increase compute time and memory use; for long clips, consider splitting into segments and/or downscaling, then upscaling the edited result.
- Overly complex prompts that mix many unrelated styles or multiple conflicting instructions can cause inconsistent edits across frames or partial transformations.
- For identity- or style-critical work (e.g., consistent character replacement), you may need multiple passes and prompt refinements to stabilize appearance across the whole clip.
- Since there is no public reference for default hyperparameters, practitioners should expect to perform empirical tuning (guidance scales, number of steps, strength of edit) to balance fidelity to the original motion against strength of the visual change.
- As with similar models, there is typically a trade-off between speed and quality: fewer steps and lower resolution run faster but may introduce flicker, artifacts, or incomplete edits.
- Ensure you have rights to modify the input footage; real-world deployments must consider copyright, likeness rights, and content policies.
Tips & Tricks
How to Use kling-o1-video-to-video-edit on Eachlabs
Access kling-o1-video-to-video-edit seamlessly through Eachlabs Playground for instant testing with video uploads, text prompts, optional reference images, and settings like aspect ratio or sound preservation; integrate via API with parameters including model="kling-o1-video-edit-fast", video_urls array (one 6-20s clip), image_urls (up to 4), and keep_original_sound. Outputs deliver high-quality 1080p MP4 videos with preserved motion, ready for production apps.
---Capabilities
- Can transform the visual style of an existing video (e.g., realistic to anime, cinematic grading, painterly look) while maintaining original camera motion and timing.
- Can change subjects (e.g., turn a person into a stylized character, change clothing, species, or appearance) as long as the new subject is compatible with the original poses and motion.
- Can modify environments and backgrounds (e.g., replace a street with a fantasy landscape, day to night, summer to winter) without manually rotoscoping or masking every frame.
- Can apply consistent color grading and aesthetic changes across frames, producing more coherent outputs than naive frame-by-frame image editing.
- Supports natural-language control, making it accessible to users who are not experts in traditional video editing or compositing.
- Well-suited to short-to-medium length clips where temporal coherence is important and manual VFX work would be expensive.
- Can serve as a rapid ideation tool for directors, designers, and animators to visualize alternative looks or concepts over existing footage.
---WHATCANI_USE FOR---
- Professional applications:
- Rapid look development and previs: applying different visual styles or environments to live-action plates to explore creative directions before committing to full VFX pipelines.
- Proof-of-concept marketing videos: quickly generating stylized or themed variants of product or brand footage for campaign testing.
- Conceptual cinematography: testing lighting, mood, or setting variations on existing shots for pitches and mood reels.
- Creative projects:
- Music videos and short films where live-action footage is transformed into stylized animation or surreal environments without frame-by-frame rotoscoping.
- Experimental art films that require fluid, dreamlike transformations of scenes while preserving choreography and camera movement.
- Fan edits and personal remixes of existing footage (subject to rights), exploring alternative aesthetics (e.g., “anime version,” “retro VHS,” “oil painting”).
- Business use cases:
- Fast generation of themed variants of corporate videos (e.g., seasonal, regional, or stylistic adaptations) while preserving original pacing and messaging.
- Visual A/B testing of brand styles on the same base footage to inform design and marketing decisions.
- Personal projects:
- Turning everyday smartphone videos into stylized clips (cartoon, watercolor, cinematic) for social sharing.
- Reimagining travel or event footage in different artistic styles or fictional universes.
- Industry-specific applications:
- Entertainment and media: previs, style exploration, and quick VFX mockups.
- Advertising: rapid concept visualization for clients using their own footage.
- Education and training: creating stylized or anonymized versions of real-world recordings (e.g., replacing faces or environments) for privacy-conscious content, where legally and ethically appropriate.
What Can I Use It For?
Use Cases for kling-o1-video-to-video-edit
Content creators can upload raw footage of a product demo and prompt "Transform the video with cinematic color grading, smooth transitions, and a sunset beach environment while preserving the original hand movements", instantly restyling it for social media without altering timing or motion—perfect for rapid AI video restyling in high-volume production.
Marketers building video-to-video editing API tools for e-commerce use reference images of luxury settings to edit product videos, swapping backgrounds to marble counters or neon-lit shelves while keeping original audio and gestures, streamlining personalized ad variants without studio costs.
Developers integrating Kling video-to-video for apps can process user-uploaded clips with multi-image guidance, enabling features like character swaps in tutorials—preserving scene consistency across edits for educational platforms or AR previews.
Filmmakers iterate on short scenes by feeding 10-second clips plus style references, prompting changes to lighting or props via the unified engine, accelerating pre-vis workflows where motion fidelity is critical over full regenerations.
Things to Be Aware Of
- Because there is no public, model-specific documentation for “kling-o1-video-to-video-edit,” all operational behavior, performance characteristics, and resource requirements must be determined empirically in your environment.
- Video-to-video models can exhibit experimental behaviors such as:
- Temporal flicker or subtle “breathing” in textures, especially under strong style changes or at high resolutions.
- Occasional structural drift, where objects or faces morph slightly over time despite an intent to preserve motion.
- Known quirks from similar models that may apply:
- Fine text (e.g., signage, UI elements) and small logos are often unstable or unreadable after editing.
- Hands, small objects, and fast-moving elements can be distorted or inconsistently rendered.
- Performance considerations:
- High-resolution, long-duration clips require substantial GPU memory and processing time; practitioners often batch process shorter segments.
- Real-time or near-real-time processing is generally not feasible at high quality; workflows are typically offline.
- Consistency factors:
- Maintaining exact identity (e.g., same face, same clothing details) over long clips is challenging; multiple runs and prompt adjustments are often needed.
- Large changes in environment plus large changes in subject in a single pass can increase instability; multi-pass workflows may yield more stable results.
- Positive patterns observed with comparable systems:
- Users report strong visual impact and high perceived production value when applying consistent stylization across short clips.
- Non-expert users can achieve impressive transformations using only textual instructions, reducing the need for advanced compositing skills.
- Common concerns with similar technology:
- Artifacts at scene cuts or transitions if the model is run blindly over concatenated footage.
- Ethical and legal issues around identity manipulation, deepfakes, and misuse if safeguards are not applied.
- Difficulty in guaranteeing frame-perfect continuity for demanding professional VFX workflows.
Limitations
- Lack of public, model-specific documentation or benchmarks for “kling-o1-video-to-video-edit” means its exact architecture, performance, and constraints are unknown; all details above are inferred from the general class of video-to-video editing models rather than confirmed for this specific identifier.
- Video-to-video generative editing is not yet a drop-in replacement for professional, shot-critical VFX: it can introduce temporal artifacts, identity drift, and loss of fine detail, making it less suitable for high-end, frame-accurate work without manual cleanup.
- Large compute and memory requirements, plus processing time that scales with resolution and duration, make it less optimal for very long or ultra-high-resolution footage, real-time applications, or resource-constrained environments.
Pricing
Pricing Type: Dynamic
output duration * 0.168$
Related AI Models
You can seamlessly integrate advanced AI capabilities into your applications without the hassle of managing complex infrastructure.
